Wednesday, May 9, 2012

The best kindle/tablet case hasn't been invented yet

But I made a prototype the other day.  This is copyrighted, so when you steal it you have to give me a cut of the profits and a demonstration model, but it's really simple: Tablets (and especially ereaders) should be more ergonomic.  They need a case that's like a squeezy ball taped to the back of a Kindle or iPad.  The new cases with a glove on the back of a tablet are close, but they still need that grippy squeezy ball.  Especially when your reading in bed.  Currently I masking taped a squeezy ball to the back of my Kindle.  I really like it.  I might have to get more tape and try to attach it again.  Anyway.  This would be the best case.  Please contact me if you want to design and manufacture it so I can have one or if there's one already in existence that I could buy.  Maybe I don't know how to describe it.

TL;DR: squeezy ball on back of Kindle/iPad Case for ergonomic reading (© Copyright 2012, Thunt Industries)

Sunday, April 1, 2012

E-Book prices need to compete with Used Book Prices


It's not really a competition is it?  $19.89 for the new copy, $14.39 for the Kindle Edition or $5.75 for the used book (shipped).  After you've paid $70-$140 for your Kindle you then have to pay three times the used price to get your electronic book (that costs nothing to produce).  It just boggles the mind.  I know it must go down.  Why are they wasting their time?  Why not sell more copies at a lower price?  It's going to happen eventually.  Until then, I guess I'll be waiting for my good friend the used bookseller to ship me a copy.  

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

Down with Amazon Kindle's Clipping Limit - The reason I bought books was to annotate them electronically


This is why we can't be friends Amazon.  You sold me on the future of reading and you actually delivered.  Now just bring the publishers in line.  Restore my ability to digitally annotate and (for chrissake ADVERTISE your books for you to my readers)!  I enjoyed this book.  I enjoyed marking it.  I'd enjoy sharing it.  I'm not trying to steal it. I already bought both the hard copy and the electronic copy. I'm dedicated.  Why does the publisher hate me?  I'm just a reader.  I love to read.  I love to mark things. (I also hate it that you're so lazy amazon.  You're so lazy you won't let me annotate sample content, probably because you're too lazy to write code to transfer the notes to the paid version of the book.  Maybe you're trying to say that annotation is a feature you get when you pay for the book, which I did.  Now give me my feature.  Give me my annotation.)

Sunday, March 4, 2012

Sharing Not Supported: How Amazon bowed to publishers and destroyed the Kindle

Amazon.  For every advantage the technology gives you, I can't believe you let the publishers take it from you.  I just finished reading Stephen King's brilliant 11/22/63.  When I reached the end of the book, I was offered the chance to tweet that I had finished the book, adding a link to the book and essentially advertising the book and the Kindle that I used to read it.  I said okay.  It then responded with the error message that has been the bane of my kindle existance:  SHARING NOT SUPPORTED.

Why Amazon?  Why did you even bother making an electronic book if you planned to take everything that made it new and exciting away?  Sure I could tweet excerpts from the book and share my progress as I read it, but I wouldn't be able to use my kindle's built in wifi and keyboard and the technological ability to do so, because Amazon, once a marketplace, now a technology company gave that technology away to the short-sighted publishers who will not exist in a few years.  They gave it away.  They allowed them to lock the books and keep them away from the modern features that could keep them alive.  They said you may pay for the book, you may pay for the reader, but if you want to share a quote or announce that you finished the book, you can't.  Book Publishers are afraid of the future and afraid of technology and instead of convincing them that they were wrong, Amazon just went along with it and destroyed the Kindle.

Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Kindle still not displaying cover art

I'm reading 11/22/63 and I paused.  Why is my Kindle showing Jules Verne instead of the cover of 11/22/63?  I paid more to get the adfree kindle, why not give me a nice adfree feature of seeing the cover of the book I'm reading?  (not asking for a full dashboard with weather, though that would be a nice option, keyword option, you could turn it off)

Sharing not supported

was enjoying Stephen King's new book (11/22/1963) and I wanted to share a quote, maybe get some discussion going, when I was met with that horrible sign "Sharing not supported".  This is why the Kindle fails.  I want a bold new world of reading.  The technology is there.  But amazon, the company from whom I bought all my books now stands in the way as gatekeeper?  Why?

you're not protecting anything.  You're losing everything.

Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Annotating is disabled for sample content

You fail me again, Amazon.com.  You fail me again.  Here I am, trying to be good.  Sampling a real book.  Thinking about buying.  Reading the first chapter.  Enjoying it.  Then I want to highlight a good passage.  There's a good chance I'll buy this book.  I'm a potential customer.  What am I greeted with:

Annotating is disabled for sample content

This is not the way to treat people.  I could spread awareness about the book by tweeting out a quote.  I could be well served as a customer by being able to annotate the first chapter and then transfer my annotations to a paid version of the book.  Why?  Why, Amazon.com, must you allow the foolish publishers to block access to the very tools that make e-reading the future?  Why must you allow them to stand in the way?  Why treat your users like this?  There is no DRM on pirated content.  Why must you continue to make paid content inferior?

Tuesday, October 18, 2011

Best use for a Kindle: Reading Big Books, Series Books and Free Classics

I really like to read big books like Infinite Jest or Moby Dick on the Kindle.  This way I have no idea how much the book actually weighs when I carry it around.  Sure I have to read it for what seems like forever (which is counterintuitive, because the kindle is so thin), although when I finish I don't have a trophy to put on my shelf, all I have to do is return to the menu to pick out another book and keep the reading going.  (it's also great for series books.  Finishing Book 6 of Dune and instantly starting Book 7 was quite a cool way to go.  Also a big fan of the free classics.)

The Kindle should display the cover of the last read book instead of Jane Austen's dour face

Image from a google search for Jane Austin Kindle
Okay.  Sponsored Kindle is a big hit.  I don't like ads, but other people don't care and love cheap things, so Sponsored Kindle is the hottest thing around.  I was wrong on that one, but it still doesn't mean that Amazon couldn't update the original paid Kindle to display the cover the book you've been reading so that the device more resembles a normal book.  I think it would really help me restart my reading more than seeing Jane Austen's dour face.  (or a way to choose certain authors, choose different screen savers, etcera, etecera)  Capturing an image on screen is a really neat feature of e-ink and I don't think Amazon has done near enough to exploit this technology for it's non-advertising based users.

It could also display recent things you've highlighted, a list of recent books you've read, quotes from your friends, their reading progress, your reading progress, general reading based stats.  In general I'd say the thing doesn't give me nearly enough stats or coach my reading, but I guess that's a topic for another day.   For now I'll just wish again, for the thing to display a proper book cover instead of Jane Austen's dour face.

Wednesday, June 29, 2011

Amazon Cloud Player - Add to playlist with just 5 clicks! - Set phasers on annoying


This the worst kind of dialogue box.  Every attempt to use it involves a wasted click.  Let's say I just want to add it to my "_Tops" playlist, that I'm using as a pathetic kludge until they add a star button.  If it showed the first playlist in the selector, I could just click Save and be done with this.  Instead, I have to click, select the playlist, and then click save. Everytime. Waste of clicks.  Waste of time.  Annoying.


Amazon Cloud Player
Number of Clicks to Add to Playlist5


1. Click Song
2. Click Add to Playlist
3. Click select playlist
4. Click playlist name
5. Click Save


Google Music Beta
Number of Clicks to Add to Playlist2

1. Click Select Song
- Drop down menus to playlist
2. Click playlist name



iTunes
Number of Clicks to Add to Playlist2

1. Select Song
2. Drag and drop to playlist


Disclaimer: Okay.  I see it now.  They have another add playlist button along the top of the song list that uses drop downs.  But when you click on the song, that one doesn't have the drop downs. Google seems simpler, but that's only because they're only working through song at at time, not having reached the multiple select stage of complexity.



Amazon Cloud Player - Quick Hits

1. Unhide the volume controls!

2. Make the Controls/song information it's own frame so I can control my music all the time.

3. Need Star button to like songs, rate songs, etc.  I'm sure you know all that, but it still seems really odd that you're ahead of google, but you don't even have a simple star, so I can add a good song to a starred list.

4. I like the Latest Purchases button, but maybe it should be a "+ menu" that shows me the recent albums so I can quickly select the album I bought and listen only to that with a few clicks.

5. Skips - if I skip a song it should be depreciated.  Also without a play count column it's a bit tough to figure out where I was in an album if I accidentally close the browser tab (which seems to be the biggest problem so far.  Accidental Tab Closure = Music Stoppage and Total Place Loss.  This is the one that needs to be fixed in this cloud player thing is going to take off.)

6. Columns don't sort, no track numbers.  Basically it's just confusing to drill down to an album to avoid random shuffling.  It has a very mp3.com circa 2000 feel.  Yawnsville.

Sunday, June 5, 2011

Kindle Screensaver - It needs to display the book cover

I really don't understand why, when I turn the Kindle off, it doesn't display the cover of the book I'm currently reading.  It would help it seem more like a real book (whenever you looked at it, you'd say, wow I can't wait to start reading "Book Title" again...), instead of a strange screensaver, that sometimes I like (showing pictures of authors I read who are smiling) and sometimes I don't like (creepy pictures of Emily Dickinson, Virginia Woolf and other authors who have committed suicide).  What's the deal Amazon?  This is Kindle3 and it still doesn't display the book cover?  Just seems silly.

Tuesday, May 17, 2011

Kindle Leather Lighted Cover

I bought the Kindle Leather Lighted Cover at the same time as the kindle and most of the time I find myself removing the Kindle from the cover and setting the cover aside to make the Kindle lighter and I have rarely had reason to use the light.  It seems like a nice protector when I slide the kindle + cover into my laptop bag for travel, but it doesn't seem like I'm really using it to it's full potential.  Maybe something like a sleeve would be more appropriate for my needs.  I'd sure like to try one.

Thursday, April 14, 2011

Kindle for Mac: Feedback Screen discourages feedback


Message boxes like this make me never want to leave feedback.  You care enough for me to do free tech support for you, but you're not going to give me credit for any of my ideas or be able to ask me clarifying questions about my complaints?  Really seems like a black hole that I don't know why anyone would want to contribute feedback to.  Just like the classic SNL Sketch:  "We're the Phone Company.  We don't care.  We don't have to."

Lilly Tomlin in the Classic SNL Phone Company Sketch



Kindle for Mac: Mousewheel page scrolling really unnecessary

I keep scrolling by my Kindle window, causing the pages to flip uncontrollably and me to curse, trying to get back to the page I was on, while not spoiling the material now flying past my eyes.  Why is mousewheel scrolling necessary on Kindle for Mac?  People are reading your books for fun, yes?  Who's trying to scroll faster through their endlessly descriptive seemingly never-ending heavily footnoted tome?  Scrolling is for webpages with gobs of useless information that you're really only searching through to find the section you want to read.  Reading books is different.  Under no circumstances do I want the pages flying by at a rate so fast I can't read them.  You're not planning on adding a scrollwheel to the next version of the Kindle are you?  Then why'd you put one in your Kindle for Mac software?  Does anybody at Amazon test this software?  Anybody who reads (at the whole company, not just the testing department)?  Cause I don't see reading and scrolling to be the same thing.

Ah well.  More endless hot air as I complain to no one.  Back to my book.